
Memetic algorithms (MAs) are a powerful resource when dealing with optimization problems, combining the diversification of the population-based approaches with the intensification of local search. However, their success depends on the combination of operators and their ability to cope with the intrinsic difficulties of a problem. Choosing the most suitable combination of operators that better suits a given problem (or a set of instances of a problem) has proved to be a defiant and time-consuming task. An approach to this task is the adaptive operator selection (AOS), based on the idea of choosing operators during execution time based on some reward system related to their performance. In this paper, we continue our previous work on studying the effectiveness of several operators of an MA to solve the cyclic bandwidth sum problem (CBSP), now extending the operator set and incorporating the dynamic multi-armed bandit (DMAB) framework to adaptively adjust the MA's operators. The resulting technique, named DMAB+MA, is compared to the independent MA versions in a full factorial experiment and with respect to two reference algorithms of the literature. It was found that the quality of the solutions achieved by DMAB+MA significantly improved the best-known results provided by the state-of-the-art algorithms while keeping the competitive execution times with respect to the independent MA versions. Moreover, DMAB+MA was able to provide optimal/best-known solutions for the 40 tested graphs (with different topologies) and to establish new better upper bounds for 12 of them.
Cyclic bandwidth sum problem, adaptive operator selection, dynamic multi-armed bandit, memetic algorithms, Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering, TK1-9971
Cyclic bandwidth sum problem, adaptive operator selection, dynamic multi-armed bandit, memetic algorithms, Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering, TK1-9971
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 10 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
