
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script> Copyright policy )
 Copyright policy )Wireless networks typically employ some form of forward error correction (FEC) coding and some automatic repeat request (ARQ) protocol to ensure reliable data transmission over lossy channels. We propose to integrate FEC and ARQ in the context of random linear network coding (RLNC). In particular, we develop Caterpillar RLNC with feedback (CRLNC-FB), an RLNC approach with a finite sliding packet transmission window in conjunction with feedback-based selective repeat ARQ. CRLNC-FB employs a novel RLNC decoding method based on a band-form of Gaussian elimination. In response to lost packets, CRLNC-FB retransmits lost packets in systematic (uncoded) form to aid fast in-order packet delivery at the receiver. Extensive performance evaluations indicate that CRLNC-FB gives higher throughput-delay performance than the preceding RLNC approaches with feedback. In particular, CRLNC-FB with its sliding window achieves lower delays than block-based RLNC. Also, the retransmission of uncoded source packets in CRLNC-FB contributes to a significantly higher throughput-delay performance than loss recovery through coded packets interspersed among future source packets at a prescribed code rate.
Automatic repeat request (ARQ) protocol, Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering, reliable data transfer, packet delay, random linear network coding (RLNC), throughput-delay tradeoff, TK1-9971
Automatic repeat request (ARQ) protocol, Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering, reliable data transfer, packet delay, random linear network coding (RLNC), throughput-delay tradeoff, TK1-9971
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 37 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | 
