
As cloud computing becomes increasingly popular, cloud providers compete to offer the same or similar services over the Internet. Quality of service (QoS), which describes how well a service is performed, is an important differentiator among functionally equivalent services. It can help a firm to satisfy and win its customers. As a result, how to assist cloud providers to promote their services and cloud consumers to identify services that meet their QoS requirements becomes an important problem. In this paper, we argue for QoS-based cloud service recommendation, and propose a collaborative filtering approach using the Spearman coefficient to recommend cloud services. The approach is used to predict both QoS ratings and rankings for cloud services. To evaluate the effectiveness of the approach, we conduct extensive simulations. Results show that the approach can achieve more reliable rankings, yet less accurate ratings, than a collaborative filtering approach using the Pearson coefficient.
Databases and Information Systems, quality of service (QoS), Electrical and Electronics, Collaborative filtering, Quality of service (QoS), TK1-9971, Systems and Communications, collaborative filtering, Recommender systems, Cloud computing, Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering, recommender systems, Digital Communications and Networking
Databases and Information Systems, quality of service (QoS), Electrical and Electronics, Collaborative filtering, Quality of service (QoS), TK1-9971, Systems and Communications, collaborative filtering, Recommender systems, Cloud computing, Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering, recommender systems, Digital Communications and Networking
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 49 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
