
This paper considers a sequential sensor scheduling and remote estimation problem with multiple communication channels. Departing from the classical remote estimation paradigm, which involves one communication channel (noiseless or noisy), we consider here the more realistic setting of two channels with different characteristics (one is cheap but noisy, the other one is costly but noiseless). We first show, via a counter-example, that the common folklore of applying symmetric threshold-based policy, which is well known to be optimal (for unimodal state densities) in the classical remote estimation problem, can no longer be optimal in our setting. In view of that, and in order to make the problem tractable, we introduce a side channel which signals to the receiver the sign of the underlying state. We show, under some technical assumptions, that a threshold-in-threshold based communication scheduling is optimal. The impact of the results is analyzed numerically based on dynamic programming. This numerical analysis reveals some rather surprising results inheriting known properties from the single channel settings, such as not exhausting all the opportunities available for the noisy channel.
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Information Theory, Information Theory (cs.IT), Systems and Control (eess.SY), Electrical Engineering and Systems Science - Systems and Control, Optimization and Control (math.OC), FOS: Electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, FOS: Mathematics, Mathematics - Optimization and Control
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Information Theory, Information Theory (cs.IT), Systems and Control (eess.SY), Electrical Engineering and Systems Science - Systems and Control, Optimization and Control (math.OC), FOS: Electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, FOS: Mathematics, Mathematics - Optimization and Control
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 20 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
