
doi: 10.1109/89.736333
This paper describes a block (affine) projection algorithm that has exactly the same convergence rate as the original sample-by-sample algorithm and smaller computational complexity than the fast affine projection algorithm. This is achieved by (1) introducing a correction term that compensates for the filter output difference between the sample-by-sample projection algorithm and the straightforward block projection algorithm, and (2) applying a fast finite impulse response (FIR) filtering technique to compute the filter outputs and to update the filter. We describe how to choose a pair of block lengths that gives the longest filter length under a constraint on the total computational complexity and processing delay. An example shows that the filter length can be doubled if a delay of a few hundred samples is permissible.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 32 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
