
doi: 10.1109/8.554247
Traditionally, generalized impedance boundary conditions (GIBCs) have been used to model dielectrics and coated surfaces, and absorbing boundary conditions (ABCs) have been used to simulate nonreflecting surfaces. The two types have the same mathematical form and, in most instances, a higher order condition involving higher order field derivatives has a better accuracy. We demonstrate that there is a close connection between the two and this enables us to use a systematic method which is available for generating GIBCs of any desired order to derive new two- and three-dimensional ABCs. The method is applicable to curvilinear/doubly-curved surfaces and examples are given. Finally, curves are presented that quantify the accuracy of two-dimensional ABCs up to the fourth order, and show how higher order ABCs can improve the efficiency of large scale partial differential equation (PDE) solutions.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 27 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
