
doi: 10.1109/69.469824
The paper presents an approach to causal knowledge elicitation supported by a tool directly used by the domain expert. This knowledge elicitation approach is characterized by trying to guess an interpretation of the knowledge entered by the expert. The tool (initially general), as it is used, self customizes its guessing capability, remembers failures in guessing (in order to avoid similar failures in the future) and when they occur elicits their explanations. Even in this case, elicitation is supported by guessing on the basis of previous similar failures. The resulting overall effect is that the tool digs up tenaciously causal knowledge from the expert's mind, playing in this way a cooperative role for model building. >
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
