
Growing numbers of plant engineers, energy managers, motor manufacturers, and even instrument suppliers are advocating the performance of simple and reliable methods of testing motor efficiency in the field, at a user's plant, as a basis for economic studies of the benefits of higher-efficiency motor designs. It is argued that although these tests are often simple, their accuracy leaves much to be desired. Experimental evaluation of motor losses is quite complex. Results can vary widely even under the best of factory conditions. A field test, therefore, should not be considered a proof test. The stray loss problem, effects of voltage variation, and instrumentation are discussed. >
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 15 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
