
doi: 10.1109/18.910590
Summary: This paper introduces a family of error-correcting codes called zigzag codes. A zigzag code is described by a highly structured zigzag graph. Due to the structural properties of the graph, very low-complexity soft-in/soft-out decoding rules can be implemented. We present a decoding rule, based on the max-log-APP (MLA) formulation, which requires a total of only 20 addition-equivalent operations per information bit, per iteration. Simulation of a rate-1/2 concatenated zigzag code with four constituent encoders with interleaver length 65 536, yields a bit error rate of \(10^{-5}\) at 0.9 dB and 1.4 dB away from the Shannon limit by optimal (APP) and low-cost suboptimal (MLA) decoders, respectively. A union bound analysis of the bit error probability of the zigzag code is presented. It is shown that the union bounds for these codes can be generated very efficiently. It is also illustrated that, for a fixed interleaver size, the concatenated code has increased code potential as the number of constituent encoders increases. Finally, the analysis shows that zigzag codes with four or more constituent encoders have lower error floors than comparable turbo codes with two constituent encoders.
low-complexity decoding, decoding, Other types of codes, Decoding, Applications of graph theory, Error probability in coding theory, turbo codes, parallel-concatenated codes, zigzag graph, bit error probability, zigzag codes
low-complexity decoding, decoding, Other types of codes, Decoding, Applications of graph theory, Error probability in coding theory, turbo codes, parallel-concatenated codes, zigzag graph, bit error probability, zigzag codes
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 98 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
