
doi: 10.1109/18.910579
Summary: Low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes can be considered serious competitors to turbo codes in terms of performance and complexity and they are based on a similar philosophy: constrained random code ensembles and iterative decoding algorithms. In this paper, we consider the encoding problem for LDPC codes. More generally, we consider the encoding problem for codes specified by sparse parity-check matrices. We show how to exploit the sparseness of the parity-check matrix to obtain efficient encoders. For the \((3, 6)\)-regular LDPC code, for example, the complexity of encoding is essentially quadratic in the block length. However, we show that the associated coefficient can be made quite small, so that encoding codes even of length \(n\simeq 100 000\) is still quite practical. More importantly, we will show that ``optimized'' codes actually admit linear time encoding.
Other types of codes, Decoding, Analysis of algorithms and problem complexity, sparse matrices, Applications of graph theory, Source coding, encoding, Channel models (including quantum) in information and communication theory, low-density parity-check codes, parity check, turbo codes, binary erasure channel, random graphs
Other types of codes, Decoding, Analysis of algorithms and problem complexity, sparse matrices, Applications of graph theory, Source coding, encoding, Channel models (including quantum) in information and communication theory, low-density parity-check codes, parity check, turbo codes, binary erasure channel, random graphs
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 781 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 0.1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 0.01% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
