
Summary: We apply the complexity-regularization principle to statistical ill-posed inverse problems in imaging. The class of problems studied includes restoration of images corrupted by Gaussian or Poisson noise and nonlinear transformations. We formulate a natural distortion measure in image space and develop nonasymptotic bounds on estimation performance in terms of an index of resolvability that characterizes the compressibility of the true image. These bounds extend previous results that were obtained in the literature under simpler observational models. The notion of asymptotic imaging experiment is clarified and used to characterize consistency and convergence rates of the estimator. We present a connection between complexity-regularized estimation and rate-distortion theory, which suggests a method for constructing optimal codebooks. However, the design of computationally tractable complexity-regularized image estimators is quite challenging; we present some of the issues involved and illustrate them with a Poisson-imaging application.
maximum-likelihood estimation, rate-distortion theory, imaging, complexity-regularized estimation, nonparametric estimation, Computing methodologies for image processing, Rate-distortion theory in information and communication theory, ill-posed inverse problems, image restoration, image compression, minimum description length principle, codebooks, Image processing (compression, reconstruction, etc.) in information and communication theory, distortion measure
maximum-likelihood estimation, rate-distortion theory, imaging, complexity-regularized estimation, nonparametric estimation, Computing methodologies for image processing, Rate-distortion theory in information and communication theory, ill-posed inverse problems, image restoration, image compression, minimum description length principle, codebooks, Image processing (compression, reconstruction, etc.) in information and communication theory, distortion measure
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 19 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
