
doi: 10.1109/10.828145
pmid: 10763291
Various approaches to the solution to the inverse problem of electrocardiography have been proposed over the years. Recently, the use of inverse algorithms using measured body surface Laplacians has been proposed, and in various studies this technique has been shown to outperform the traditional use of body surface potentials in certain model problems. In this paper, we compare the use of body surface potentials and body surface Laplacians on two model problems with different assumed cardiac sources. For the spherical cap model problems with an anterior source, the epicardial estimates using body surface potentials had smaller average relative errors than when body surface Laplacians were used. For the spherical cap model problems with a posterior source, the epicardial estimates using body surface potential or body surface Laplacian sensors generally produced similar relative errors. For the radial dipole model, the epicardial estimates using body surface Laplacians had smaller errors than when body surface potentials were used. We introduce a fusion algorithm that combines the different types of signals and generally produces a good estimate for both model problems.
Electrocardiography, Body Surface Potential Mapping, Linear Models, Models, Cardiovascular, Normal Distribution, Algorithms
Electrocardiography, Body Surface Potential Mapping, Linear Models, Models, Cardiovascular, Normal Distribution, Algorithms
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 23 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
