Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

COMPARISON OF MANAGERIAL AND NON‐MANAGERIAL EMPLOYEES' DESIRED AND PERCEIVED MOTIVATORS AND JOB SATISFACTION LEVELS

Authors: Lawson K. Savery;

COMPARISON OF MANAGERIAL AND NON‐MANAGERIAL EMPLOYEES' DESIRED AND PERCEIVED MOTIVATORS AND JOB SATISFACTION LEVELS

Abstract

This study was conducted in the headquarters of a major local government in Western Australia. The emphasis of the study was to measure any differences that may exist between managers and non‐managers concerning their desire for different motivators, levels of job satisfaction and areas of job stressors. It was discovered that the non‐managers preferred extrinsic motivators whereas the managers preferred intrinsic ones. These findings support many of the ideas of the much‐maligned human relations theorists of the 1950s and 1960s. The level of job satisfaction was not significantly different between the groups. However, when consideration was given to the question of whether the respondents would choose the same type of work if they had their choice over again, then managers would significantly more often choose their present occupation, suggesting, at least, that the managerial occupation is more satisfying than a non‐managerial position, but the firm itself may not be the receiver of this satisfaction. The final point is that the managerial group perceived that they were asked to cope more often with unreasonable deadlines and excessive work demands. This finding suggests there is a need for a work‐analysis and an exhaustive job description and specification for all managerial and non‐managerial jobs. This would allow the organisations to identify those members from both groups who are overworked.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    6
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
6
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!