
doi: 10.1108/eb049978
A scientific paper usually contains a bibliography of earlier literature that has been consulted by the author during the course of his work, and the following up of such references has always been a fruitful and well‐used method of tracing earlier information on a subject. Some figures given in a recent Aslib research report confirm this. Of the twelve methods which a group of scientists used to seek information, the following up of references cited in relevant papers was the most popular method, practised by 80 per cent of the sample.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
