The Role of Feedback on the Relationship Between Budgetary Participation and Performance

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 01 Feb 2002 English Publisher:EmeraldJournal:Pacific Accounting Review, volume 14, pages 33-55 (issn: 0114-0582,

Copyright policy )

Authors: Vincent Chong; Kar Ming Chong;

doi: 10.1108/eb037966

The Role of Feedback on the Relationship Between Budgetary Participation and Performance

- Summary
- Metrics

Abstract

This study examines the moderating effect of feedback on the relationship between budgetary participation and performance. The responses of 79 managers, drawn from a cross‐section of Australian manufacturing companies, to a questionnaire survey were analysed using a multiple regression technique. The results show that independently, budgetary participation and feedback have no effect on performance. The results confirm that the higher the level of feedback, the more positive is the relationship between budgetary participation and performance.

Related Organizations

UNSW Sydney
Australia
University of Western Australia
Australia
Western University
Canada

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	17
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 10%
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average