
doi: 10.1108/eb028321
The fair evaluation of employees is crucial to the well being of the organisation, the manager and the employee. This article looks at four factors that have been shown to bias the appraisal process. These factors are the style of dress of the employee vis‐a‐vis the rater, the attributions made by both rater and ratee regarding performance, the prior expectations of the supervisor regarding the employee's performance, and the effect of employee grievances on his or her subsequent evaluations. These four factors are but four of many possible biases that enter into the evaluation process because of the human dynamic. They are instructive, but more importantly they should serve to alert appraisers to the many possible biases that may be operative in them but of which they are unaware.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
