
doi: 10.1108/eb024100
The commands and features of four selected online document ordering systems are compared, and potentially useful features lacking in these systems are suggested. Three advantages of such systems are examined: referral to efficient document suppliers, convenience, and speed. Despite this, a telephone survey of German users shows very low usage, and reasons for this are suggested — primarily cost, and the ability to supply requests from in‐house or local sources. For very urgent orders cost is a minor factor but for normal ones it is the most important. The users surveyed also comment on the features available in current ordering systems.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
