
arXiv: 1712.02368
handle: 10356/88412 , 10220/45747
Causal asymmetry is one of the great surprises in predictive modelling: the memory required to predict the future differs from the memory required to retrodict the past. There is a privileged temporal direction for modelling a stochastic process where memory costs are minimal. Models operating in the other direction incur an unavoidable memory overhead. Here we show that this overhead can vanish when quantum models are allowed. Quantum models forced to run in the less natural temporal direction not only surpass their optimal classical counterparts, but also any classical model running in reverse time. This holds even when the memory overhead is unbounded, resulting in quantum models with unbounded memory advantage.
Journal reference included, 7 pages, 4 figures plus appendices, comments welcome
Quantum Physics, Stochastic systems, Classical counterpart, Physics, QC1-999, Random processes, Classical model, FOS: Physical sciences, Memory overheads, Condensed Matter Physics, Quantum world, Predictive modeling, Quantum models, Unbounded memory, DRNTU::Science::Physics, Memory cost, Quantum Information, Quantum Physics (quant-ph), Astronomical and Space Sciences
Quantum Physics, Stochastic systems, Classical counterpart, Physics, QC1-999, Random processes, Classical model, FOS: Physical sciences, Memory overheads, Condensed Matter Physics, Quantum world, Predictive modeling, Quantum models, Unbounded memory, DRNTU::Science::Physics, Memory cost, Quantum Information, Quantum Physics (quant-ph), Astronomical and Space Sciences
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 27 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
