
We revisit the long-standing question of the relation between image appreciation and its statistical properties. We generate two different sets of random images well distributed along three measures of entropic complexity. We run a large-scale survey in which people are asked to sort the images by preference, which reveals maximum appreciation at intermediate entropic complexity. We show that the algorithmic complexity of the coarse-grained images, expected to capture structural complexity while abstracting from high frequency noise, is a good predictor of preferences. Our analysis suggests that there might exist some universal quantitative criteria for aesthetic judgement.
5 pages, 3 figures, 1 table
[PHYS]Physics [physics], FOS: Computer and information sciences, Physics - Physics and Society, Statistical Mechanics (cond-mat.stat-mech), Physics, QC1-999, FOS: Physical sciences, Physics and Society (physics.soc-ph), Computational Complexity (cs.CC), 004, Computer Science - Computational Complexity, [PHYS.COND.CM-SM]Physics [physics]/Condensed Matter [cond-mat]/Statistical Mechanics [cond-mat.stat-mech], Condensed Matter - Statistical Mechanics
[PHYS]Physics [physics], FOS: Computer and information sciences, Physics - Physics and Society, Statistical Mechanics (cond-mat.stat-mech), Physics, QC1-999, FOS: Physical sciences, Physics and Society (physics.soc-ph), Computational Complexity (cs.CC), 004, Computer Science - Computational Complexity, [PHYS.COND.CM-SM]Physics [physics]/Condensed Matter [cond-mat]/Statistical Mechanics [cond-mat.stat-mech], Condensed Matter - Statistical Mechanics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 26 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
