<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
pmid: 16090597
Standard quantum key distribution protocols are provably secure against eavesdropping attacks, if quantum theory is correct. It is theoretically interesting to know if we need to assume the validity of quantum theory to prove the security of quantum key distribution, or whether its security can be based on other physical principles. The question would also be of practical interest if quantum mechanics were ever to fail in some regime, because a scientifically and technologically advanced eavesdropper could perhaps use post-quantum physics to extract information from quantum communications without necessarily causing the quantum state disturbances on which existing security proofs rely. Here we describe a key distribution scheme provably secure against general attacks by a post-quantum eavesdropper who is limited only by the impossibility of superluminal signalling. The security of the scheme stems from violation of a Bell inequality.
Clarifications and minor revisions in response to comments. Final version; to appear in Phys. Rev. Lett
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Quantum Physics, Computer Science - Cryptography and Security, Physique, FOS: Physical sciences, Astronomie, Bell inequality, Eavesdropping attacks, Quantum key distribution, Postquantum physics, Quantum Physics (quant-ph), Cryptography and Security (cs.CR)
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Quantum Physics, Computer Science - Cryptography and Security, Physique, FOS: Physical sciences, Astronomie, Bell inequality, Eavesdropping attacks, Quantum key distribution, Postquantum physics, Quantum Physics (quant-ph), Cryptography and Security (cs.CR)
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 680 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 0.1% | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 0.1% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |