
pmid: 16907147
arXiv: cond-mat/0504608
We perform a comparative study of applicability of the Multifractal Detrended Fluctuation Analysis (MFDFA) and the Wavelet Transform Modulus Maxima (WTMM) method in proper detecting of mono- and multifractal character of data. We quantify the performance of both methods by using different sorts of artificial signals generated according to a few well-known exactly soluble mathematical models: monofractal fractional Brownian motion, bifractal Levy flights, and different sorts of multifractal binomial cascades. Our results show that in majority of situations in which one does not know a priori the fractal properties of a process, choosing MFDFA should be recommended. In particular, WTMM gives biased outcomes for the fractional Brownian motion with different values of Hurst exponent, indicating spurious multifractality. In some cases WTMM can also give different results if one applies different wavelets. We do not exclude using WTMM in real data analysis, but it occurs that while one may apply MFDFA in a more automatic fashion, WTMM has to be applied with care. In the second part of our work, we perform an analogous analysis on empirical data coming from the American and from the German stock market. For this data both methods detect rich multifractality in terms of broad f(alpha), but MFDFA suggests that this multifractality is poorer than in the case of WTMM.
substantially extended version, to appear in Phys.Rev.E
Condensed Matter - Other Condensed Matter, Nuclear Theory (nucl-th), Physics - Physics and Society, Nuclear Theory, Physics - Data Analysis, Statistics and Probability, FOS: Physical sciences, Physics and Society (physics.soc-ph), Data Analysis, Statistics and Probability (physics.data-an), Other Condensed Matter (cond-mat.other)
Condensed Matter - Other Condensed Matter, Nuclear Theory (nucl-th), Physics - Physics and Society, Nuclear Theory, Physics - Data Analysis, Statistics and Probability, FOS: Physical sciences, Physics and Society (physics.soc-ph), Data Analysis, Statistics and Probability (physics.data-an), Other Condensed Matter (cond-mat.other)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 230 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
