
In many studies, it is common to use binary (i.e., unweighted) edges to examine networks of entities that are either adjacent or not adjacent. Researchers have generalized such binary networks to incorporate edge weights, which allow one to encode node--node interactions with heterogeneous intensities or frequencies (e.g., in transportation networks, supply chains, and social networks). Most such studies have considered real-valued weights, despite the fact that networks with complex weights arise in fields as diverse as quantum information, quantum chemistry, electrodynamics, rheology, and machine learning. Many of the standard network-science approaches in the study of classical systems rely on the real-valued nature of edge weights, so it is necessary to generalize them if one seeks to use them to analyze networks with complex edge weights. In this paper, we examine how standard network-analysis methods fail to capture structural features of networks with complex edge weights. We then generalize several network measures to the complex domain and show that random-walk centralities provide a useful approach to examine node importances in networks with complex weights.
17 pages, 7 figures, 1 table
Social and Information Networks (cs.SI), FOS: Computer and information sciences, Physics - Physics and Society, Statistical Mechanics (cond-mat.stat-mech), FOS: Physical sciences, Computer Science - Social and Information Networks, Physics and Society (physics.soc-ph), Mathematical Physics (math-ph), Condensed Matter - Statistical Mechanics, Mathematical Physics
Social and Information Networks (cs.SI), FOS: Computer and information sciences, Physics - Physics and Society, Statistical Mechanics (cond-mat.stat-mech), FOS: Physical sciences, Computer Science - Social and Information Networks, Physics and Society (physics.soc-ph), Mathematical Physics (math-ph), Condensed Matter - Statistical Mechanics, Mathematical Physics
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 8 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
