
arXiv: gr-qc/0303013
handle: 1885/50031
We discuss the baseline optical configuration for the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA) mission, in which the lasers are not free-running, but rather one of them is used as the main frequency reference generator (the {\it master}) and the remaining five as {\it slaves}, these being phase-locked to the master (the {\it master-slave configuration}). Under the condition that the frequency fluctuations due to the optical transponders can be made negligible with respect to the secondary LISA noise sources (mainly proof-mass and shot noises), we show that the entire space of interferometric combinations LISA can generate when operated with six independent lasers (the {\it one-way method}) can also be constructed with the {\it master-slave} system design. The corresponding hardware trade-off analysis for these two optical designs is presented, which indicates that the two sets of systems needed for implementing the {\it one-way method}, and the {\it master-slave configuration}, are essentially identical. Either operational mode could therefore be implemented without major implications on the hardware configuration. We then.......
39 pages, 6 figures, 2 tables
calculation, Keywords: accuracy, noise, 000, interferometer, article, FOS: Physical sciences, cosmos, space, General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology (gr-qc), interferometry, mathematical analysis, optics, General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology, gravity, laser, signal detection, mass, time
calculation, Keywords: accuracy, noise, 000, interferometer, article, FOS: Physical sciences, cosmos, space, General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology (gr-qc), interferometry, mathematical analysis, optics, General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology, gravity, laser, signal detection, mass, time
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 75 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
