<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
handle: 11336/51438
Side-channel attacks currently constitute the main challenge for quantum key distribution (QKD) to bridge theory with practice. So far two main approaches have been introduced to address this problem, (full) device-independent QKD and measurement-device-independent QKD. Here we present a third solution that might exceed the performance and practicality of the previous two in circumventing detector side-channel attacks, which arguably is the most hazardous part of QKD implementations. Our proposal has, however, one main requirement: the legitimate users of the system need to ensure that their labs do not leak any unwanted information to the outside. The security in the low-loss regime is guaranteed, while in the high-loss regime we already prove its robustness against some eavesdropping strategies.
9 pages, 4 figures. Matches published version
Quantum Physics, Robustness (computer science), Physics, Eavesdropping, Quantum Key Distribution, Quantum Information Processing, Física, FOS: Physical sciences, Detector, Quantum Optics, Quantum information science, Quantum cryptography, Computer security, Implementation, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.3, Quantum key distribution, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1, Quantum Physics (quant-ph)
Quantum Physics, Robustness (computer science), Physics, Eavesdropping, Quantum Key Distribution, Quantum Information Processing, Física, FOS: Physical sciences, Detector, Quantum Optics, Quantum information science, Quantum cryptography, Computer security, Implementation, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.3, Quantum key distribution, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1, Quantum Physics (quant-ph)
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 18 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |