
arXiv: quant-ph/0411144
We describe an approach for characterizing the process of quantum gates using quantum process tomography, by first modeling them in an extended Hilbert space, which includes non-qubit degrees of freedom. To prevent unphysical processes from being predicted, present quantum process tomography procedures incorporate mathematical constraints, which make no assumptions as to the actual physical nature of the system being described. By contrast, the procedure presented here ensures physicality by placing physical constraints on the nature of quantum processes. This allows quantum process tomography to be performed using a smaller experimental data set, and produces parameters with a direct physical interpretation. The approach is demonstrated by example of mode-matching in an all-optical controlled-NOT gate. The techniques described are non-specific and could be applied to other optical circuits or quantum computing architectures.
4 pages, 2 figures, REVTeX (published version)
PHYSICS, ATOMIC, MOLECULAR & CHEMICAL, Mathematical sciences, FOS: Physical sciences, Physics, Atomic, Molecular & Chemical, Atomic, Molecular & Chemical, 530, C1, Quantum Physics, Physics, 500, Optics, 620, Physical sciences, 2200 Engineering, Chemical sciences, 240402 Quantum Optics and Lasers, 190, OPTICS, Quantum Physics (quant-ph), 780102 Physical sciences
PHYSICS, ATOMIC, MOLECULAR & CHEMICAL, Mathematical sciences, FOS: Physical sciences, Physics, Atomic, Molecular & Chemical, Atomic, Molecular & Chemical, 530, C1, Quantum Physics, Physics, 500, Optics, 620, Physical sciences, 2200 Engineering, Chemical sciences, 240402 Quantum Optics and Lasers, 190, OPTICS, Quantum Physics (quant-ph), 780102 Physical sciences
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 25 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
