
A method of measuring simultaneously the low-temperature specific heat of three samples, typically one pure-metal sample and two alloys with 1 and 2% solute, is described. The procedure is used to determine the variation of the electronic-specific-heat coefficient $\ensuremath{\gamma}$ (the coefficient of the term linear in temperature) with concentration $c$ for various solutes (Al, Si, Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Co, Ni, Mo, and W) in Fe and for Au in Ag. The simultaneous calorimetry gives an increase in relative accuracy sufficient to enable determination of variations of $(\frac{1}{\ensuremath{\gamma}})\frac{d\ensuremath{\gamma}}{\mathrm{dc}}$ to within \ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}10% for dilute alloys of Fe. For Ag(Au) alloys the variation of $\ensuremath{\gamma}$ with concentration is less than can be detected in these experiments. A linear decrease of $\ensuremath{\gamma}$ with increasing $c$ is found for six of the iron-based alloy systems. For these the values of $(\frac{1}{\ensuremath{\gamma}})\frac{d\ensuremath{\gamma}}{\mathrm{dc}}$ are: Fe(Ti), -1.0; Fe(V), -2.2; Fe(Cr), -2.0; Fe(Mo), -0.8; Fe(W), -2.4; and Fe(Co), -0.6. A nonlinear increase of $\ensuremath{\gamma}$ with $c$ is found for the remaining. The average values of $(\frac{1}{\ensuremath{\gamma}})\frac{d\ensuremath{\gamma}}{\mathrm{dc}}$ are: Fe(Al), +1.2; Fe(Si), +0.6; Fe(Mn), +2.0; and Fe(Ni), +2.6. From experiments on two-phase alloys of Fe-${\mathrm{Fe}}_{2}$Nb, $\ensuremath{\gamma}$ for ${\mathrm{Fe}}_{2}$Nb is estimated to be between 9 and 10 mJ/${\mathrm{deg}}^{2}$ mole. There appears to be a correlation of $(\frac{1}{\ensuremath{\gamma}})\frac{d\ensuremath{\gamma}}{\mathrm{dc}}$ with certain aspects of Fe-alloy phase diagrams, namely, the variations of Curie temperature and the $\ensuremath{\alpha}\ensuremath{-}\ensuremath{\gamma}$ transformation temperature with concentration of solute.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 39 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
