<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Monte Carlo cluster algorithms are popular for their efficiency in studying the Ising model near its critical temperature. We might expect that this efficiency extends to the bond-diluted Ising model. We show, however, that this is not always the case by comparing how the correlation times $��_w$ and $��_{\rm sw}$ of the Wolff and Swendsen-Wang cluster algorithms scale as a function of the system size $L$ when applied to the two-dimensional bond-diluted Ising model. We demonstrate that the Wolff algorithm suffers from a much longer correlation time than in the pure Ising model, caused by isolated (groups of) spins which are infrequently visited by the algorithm. With a simple argument we prove that these cause the correlation time $��_w$ to be bounded from below by $L^{z_w}$ with a dynamical exponent $z_w=��/ ��\approx 1.75$ for a bond concentration $p < 1$. Furthermore, we numerically show that this lower bound is actually taken for several values of $p$ in the range $0.5 < p < 1$. Moreover, we show that the Swendsen-Wang algorithm does not suffer from the same problem. Consequently, it has a much shorter correlation time, shorter than in the pure Ising model even. Numerically at $p = 0.6$, we find that its dynamical exponent is $z_{\rm sw} = 0.09(4)$.
7 pages, 4 figures
Statistics and Probability, Critical-dynamics, Statistical Mechanics (cond-mat.stat-mech), Exponents, FOS: Physical sciences, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Condensed Matter Physics, cond-mat.stat-mech, Condensed Matter - Statistical Mechanics
Statistics and Probability, Critical-dynamics, Statistical Mechanics (cond-mat.stat-mech), Exponents, FOS: Physical sciences, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Condensed Matter Physics, cond-mat.stat-mech, Condensed Matter - Statistical Mechanics
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |