Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Chemiluminescence

Authors: Larry J, Kricka;

Chemiluminescence

Abstract

Radioactive reagents have been gradually replaced by nonisotopic reagents for some tasks in molecular biology. Concern over laboratory safety and the economic and environmental aspects of radioactive waste disposal have been key factors in this change. Generally, the new nonisotopic systems have improved in terms of analytical sensitivity and the time required to obtain a result. The most prominent nonisotopic analytical methods exploit chemiluminescence, described here. This technique has been particularly effective when used in combination with an enzyme label, so that the amplifying properties of an enzyme label and the high sensitivity of a chemiluminescent detection reaction are combined to produce an ultrasensitive assay (e.g., chemiluminescent detection of peroxidase- and alkaline phosphatase-labeled proteins and nucleic acid probes). In all of the commonly used applications in molecular biology, the analytical performance of the chemiluminescent systems approaches that of 125I- or 32P-based systems. Chemiluminescent systems also avoid the lengthy signal detection times required with 32P-based methods, yielding results in minutes rather than days. In addition, chemiluminescent probes can be easily stripped from membranes, allowing the membranes to be reprobed many times without significant loss of resolution. Experimental protocols for directly attaching nonisotopic labels to nucleic acids and indirect labeling methods based on biotin, fluorescein, and digoxigenin labels are now well established. The ancillary reagents (e.g., avidin, streptavidin, antidigoxigenin, and antifluorescein enzyme conjugates) required for the indirect methods are widely available.

Keywords

Immunoassay, Luminescent Measurements, Acridines, Indicators and Reagents, Luminol, Enzyme Assays

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    10
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
10
Top 10%
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!