Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Cold Spring Harbor P...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Cold Spring Harbor Protocols
Article . 2018 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Ammonium Sulfate Fractionation of Antibodies

Authors: Jordan B, Fishman; Eric A, Berg;

Ammonium Sulfate Fractionation of Antibodies

Abstract

Before the widespread availability and use of Protein A (rabbit) or Protein G (rodent) for the purification of IgG, the use of an ammonium sulfate “cut” was the standard method to isolate IgG and other serum proteins. The addition of ammonium sulfate reduces the effective solubility of proteins through direct competition for binding sites on the surface of the protein. The resulting precipitated proteins can be isolated by centrifugation. An ammonium sulfate concentration between 40% and 50% results in the precipitation of IgG from most species, and thus 50% is usually used. Because other proteins can be “trapped” within the aggregated protein, the use of ammonium sulfate does not result in a purified antibody fraction and as such should be considered a first step in a multistep antibody purification protocol.

Keywords

Ammonium Sulfate, Animals, Chemical Fractionation, Dialysis, Antibodies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    20
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
20
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
bronze