
AbstractWhen a doctor orders a genetic test, patients assume that the test will yield a useful result to guide how their physicians take care of them. That assumption is frequently correct, but not always. Until recently, a genetic test only interrogated the sequence of one or two genes. Now, DNA-sequencing technologies are so fast and cheap that they have enabled clinicians to sequence panels of genes that may or may not be relevant to the patient's condition. The technology has outpaced our ability to interpret the results. Connecting approval of clinical tests to data sharing could help close this gap.
Commentary
Commentary
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
