Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Genome Researcharrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Genome Research
Article
Data sources: UnpayWall
Genome Research
Article . 2005 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
Genome Research
Article . 2006
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Abundant novel transcriptional units and unconventional gene pairs on human chromosome 22

Authors: Leonard, Lipovich; Mary-Claire, King;

Abundant novel transcriptional units and unconventional gene pairs on human chromosome 22

Abstract

Novel transcriptional units (TUs) are EST-supported transcribed features not corresponding to known genes. Unconventional gene pairs (UGPs) are pairs of genes and/or TUs sharing exon-to-exon cis-antisense overlaps or putative bidirectional promoters. Computational TU and UGP discovery followed by manual curation was performed in the entire published 34.9-Mb human chromosome 22 euchromatic sequence. Novel TUs (n = 517) were as abundant as known genes (n = 492) and typically did not have nonprimate DNA and protein homologies. One hundred seventy-one (33%) of TUs, but only 13 (3%) of genes, both lacked nonprimate conservation and localized to gaps in the human–mouse BLASTZ alignment. Novel TUs were richer in exonic primate-specific interspersed repetitive elements (P = 0.001) and were more likely to rely on splice junctions provided by them, than were known genes: 19% of spliced TUs, versus 5% of spliced genes, had a splice site within a primate-specific repeat. Hence, novel TUs and known genes may represent different portions of the transcriptome. Two hundred nine (21%) of chromosome 22 transcripts participated in 77 cis-antisense and 42 promoter-sharing UGPs. Transcripts involved simultaneously in both UGP types were more common than was expected (P = 0.01). UGPs were nonrandomly distributed along the sequence: 89 (75%) clustered in distinct regions, the sum of which equaled 4.4 Mb (<13% of the chromosome). Eighty (67%) of the UGPs possessed significant locus structure differences between primates and rodents. Since some TUs may be functional noncoding transcripts and since the cis-regulatory potential of UGPs is well recognized, TUs and UGPs specific to the primate lineage may contribute to the genomic basis for primate-specific phenotypes.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Euchromatin, Interspersed Repetitive Sequences, Mice, Open Reading Frames, Transcription, Genetic, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 22, Animals, Humans

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    9
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
9
Average
Average
Top 10%
bronze