
AbstractMachine learning algorithms trained to predict the regulatory activity of nucleic acid sequences have revealed principles of gene regulation and guided genetic variation analysis. While the human genome has been extensively annotated and studied, model organisms have been less explored. Model organism genomes offer both additional training sequences and unique annotations describing tissue and cell states unavailable in humans. Here, we develop a strategy to train deep convolutional neural networks simultaneously on multiple genomes and apply it to learn sequence predictors for large compendia of human and mouse data. Training on both genomes improves gene expression prediction accuracy on held out sequences. We further demonstrate a novel and powerful transfer learning approach to use mouse regulatory models to analyze human genetic variants associated with molecular phenotypes and disease. Together these techniques unleash thousands of non-human epigenetic and transcriptional profiles toward more effective investigation of how gene regulation affects human disease.
Epigenomics, QH301-705.5, Quantitative Trait Loci, Machine Learning, Mice, Databases, Genetic, Animals, Humans, Biology (General), Models, Statistical, Models, Genetic, Genome, Human, Computational Biology, Genetic Variation, Genomics, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Gene Expression Regulation, Mutation, Hepatocytes, Neural Networks, Computer, Algorithms, Software, Research Article
Epigenomics, QH301-705.5, Quantitative Trait Loci, Machine Learning, Mice, Databases, Genetic, Animals, Humans, Biology (General), Models, Statistical, Models, Genetic, Genome, Human, Computational Biology, Genetic Variation, Genomics, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Gene Expression Regulation, Mutation, Hepatocytes, Neural Networks, Computer, Algorithms, Software, Research Article
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 181 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
