
pmid: 34147631
handle: 11562/1060948 , 11577/3411156 , 11582/328268
The relationship between structure and function is of interest in many research fields involving the study of complex biological processes. In neuroscience in particular, the fusion of structural and functional data can help understanding the underlying principles of the operational networks in the brain. To address this issue, this paper proposes a constrained autoregressive model leading to a representation of “effective” connectivity that can be used to better understand how the structure modulates the function. Or simply, it can be used to find novel biomarkers characterizing groups of subjects. In practice, an initial structural connectivity representation is re-weighted to explain the functional co-activations. This is obtained by minimizing the reconstruction error of an autoregressive model constrained by the structural connectivity prior. The model has been designed to also include indirect connections, allowing to split direct and indirect components in the functional connectivity, and it can be used with raw and deconvoluted BOLD signal. The derived representation of dependencies was compared to the well known dynamic causal model, giving results closer to known ground-truth. Further evaluation of the proposed effective network was performed on two typical tasks. In a first experiment the direct functional dependencies were tested on a community detection problem, where the brain was partitioned using the effective networks across multiple subjects. In a second experiment the model was validated in a case-control task, which aimed at differentiating healthy subjects from individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Results showed that using effective connectivity leads to clusters better describing the functional interactions in the community detection task, while maintaining the original structural organization, and obtaining a better discrimination in the case-control classification task. Highlights A method to combine structural and functional connectivity by using autoregressive model is proposed. The autoregressive model is constrained by structural connectivity defining coefficients for Granger causality. The usefulness of the generated effective connections is tested on simulations, ground-truth default mode network experiments, a classification and clustering task. The method can be used for direct and indirect connections, and with raw and deconvoluted BOLD signal.
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Models, Neurological, 610, Datasets as Topic, DWI, Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry, Granger, Diffusion MRI, Structure-Activity Relationship, Connectome, Humans, Computer Simulation, Autism spectrum disorder, connectomics, Effective connectivity, DCM, Autism spectrum disorder; Connectome; DCM; Diffusion MRI; DWI; Effective connectivity; fMRI; Granger; Tractography; Autism Spectrum Disorder; Brain; Causality; Computer Simulation; Datasets as Topic; Default Mode Network; Humans; Nerve Net; Structure-Activity Relationship; Connectome; Models, Neurological, fMRI, Brain, Default Mode Network, Causality, Nerve Net, Tractography, RC321-571
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Models, Neurological, 610, Datasets as Topic, DWI, Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry, Granger, Diffusion MRI, Structure-Activity Relationship, Connectome, Humans, Computer Simulation, Autism spectrum disorder, connectomics, Effective connectivity, DCM, Autism spectrum disorder; Connectome; DCM; Diffusion MRI; DWI; Effective connectivity; fMRI; Granger; Tractography; Autism Spectrum Disorder; Brain; Causality; Computer Simulation; Datasets as Topic; Default Mode Network; Humans; Nerve Net; Structure-Activity Relationship; Connectome; Models, Neurological, fMRI, Brain, Default Mode Network, Causality, Nerve Net, Tractography, RC321-571
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 30 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
