
Summary Generalization during aversive decision-making allows us to avoid a broad range of potential threats following experience with a limited set of exemplars. However, over-generalization, resulting in excessive and inappropriate avoidance, has been implicated in a variety of psychological disorders. Here, we use reinforcement learning modelling to dissect out different contributions to the generalization of instrumental avoidance in two groups of human volunteers ( N =26, N =482). We found that generalization of avoidance could be parsed into perceptual and value-based processes, and further, that value-based generalization could be subdivided into that relating to aversive and neutral feedback - with corresponding circuits including primary sensory cortex, anterior insula, and ventromedial prefrontal cortex, respectively. Further, generalization from aversive, but not neutral, feedback was associated with self-reported anxiety and intrusive thoughts. These results reveal a set of distinct mechanisms that mediate generalization in avoidance learning, and show how specific individual differences within them can yield anxiety.
avoidance, reinforcement learning, QH301-705.5, Science, Q, Decision Making, R, Brain, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Generalization, Psychological, neuroscience, obsessive-compulsive disorder, aversive learning, anxiety disorders, Avoidance Learning, Medicine, Humans, human, Biology (General), generalization, Neuroscience
avoidance, reinforcement learning, QH301-705.5, Science, Q, Decision Making, R, Brain, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Generalization, Psychological, neuroscience, obsessive-compulsive disorder, aversive learning, anxiety disorders, Avoidance Learning, Medicine, Humans, human, Biology (General), generalization, Neuroscience
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 30 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
