
INTRODUCTION. The accumulation of atmospheric oxygen starting about 2 billion years ago was permissive for the evolution of complex aerobic metabolic pathways[1,4]. It is thus axiomatic that aerobic capacity defines both a large part of our biology and a divide in the continuum between health and disease[2]. While heritability studies predict a genetic component that accounts for as much as 70 to 90% of the variation in aerobic capacity[3], the genes causative of the difference between low and high capacity have not been defined. In 1996 we started artificial selection for low and high aerobic treadmill-running capacity in rats. The purpose was to create low-capacity runners (LCR) and high-capacity runners (HCR) that could ultimately be developed into contrasting strains for intrinsic (i.e., untrained) aerobic capacity. Here we report the response to selection across nine generations of divergent artificial selection for aerobic treadmill-running capacity.
Technology, T, Science, Q, R, Short Report, Medicine
Technology, T, Science, Q, R, Short Report, Medicine
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
