Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Journal of Medical M...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Journal of Medical Microbiology
Article . 2019 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Evaluation of inhibitor-combination mCIM for detecting MBL-producing Enterobacterales using three MBL inhibitors

Authors: Kageto Yamada; Masakazu Sasaki; Waka Imai; Hinako Murakami; Toshisuke Morita; Kotaro Aoki; Yoshikazu Ishii; +1 Authors

Evaluation of inhibitor-combination mCIM for detecting MBL-producing Enterobacterales using three MBL inhibitors

Abstract

The increase in carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE), including metallo-β-lactamase (MBL) producers, is a severe global health concern. Thus, highly sensitive and specific methods for detecting MBL producers are needed. In this study, we tested the detectability of MBL-producing Enterobacterales against three types of MBL inhibitors (sodium mercaptoacetate, SMA; ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, EDTA; and dipicolinic acid, DPA) used in combination with a modified carbapenem inactivation method (mCIM). These inhibitor-combination mCIMs were tested against 129 CPE (IMP, 93; NDM, 11; KPC, 13; NMC, 1; OXA-48, 11) and 75 non-CPE. For evaluation of MBL inhibitors, we used two concentrations for each of the three inhibitors: DPA (200 and 300 mg l- 1), EDTA (5 and 10 mM), and SMA (1500 and 3000 mg l- 1). The overall sensitivities of SMA, EDTA and DPA were 97.1-99.0 %, 81.7-99.0 % and 88.5-96.2 %, respectively. Moreover, each method showed high specificity (99.0-100 %). Although inhibitor-combination mCIMs were highly sensitive and specific for the detection of MBL producers, we found that sensitivity was dependent on the concentration of inhibitors.

Keywords

Carbapenems, Humans, Bacterial Infections, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Penicillins, beta-Lactamase Inhibitors, Gammaproteobacteria, beta-Lactamases, Anti-Bacterial Agents

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    7
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
7
Top 10%
Average
Average
bronze