Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Journal of General M...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Journal of General Microbiology
Article . 1963 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Deoxyribonucleic Acid Base Composition of Acetic Acid Bacteria

Authors: J. Schell; J. Deley;

Deoxyribonucleic Acid Base Composition of Acetic Acid Bacteria

Abstract

SUMMARY: The base composition of purified DNA from 28 strains of acetic acid bacteria was determined. Most strains of the genus Gluconobacter clustered closely together at 60.6–63.4 % (guanine + cytosine) of total base. All strains of the Acetobacter aceti biotype lay within the range 55.4–64.0 % (guanine + cytosine). The close relationship and possible common phylo-genetic origin of the genera Gluconobacter and Acetobacter is again stressed by these results. The base composition of DNA from acetic acid bacteria and from species of Pseudomonas was very similar, confirming the suspected close relationship between these groups. There is a noticeable agreement between the sequences of Acetobacter strains, arranged according to increasing % (guanine + cytosine) and arranged according to increasing enzymic equipment: strains with greater biochemical activity have on the whole also a higher % (guanine + cytosine) in DNA. The range of the compositional distribution of DNA molecules is on the whole broader in Acetobacter than in Gluconobacter. The results corroborate previous conclusions that both biotypes contain clusters of strains without species differentiation. A comparison of the paper chromatographic analysis with the method of thermal denaturation (‘melting point’) for estimating base composition of DNA showed that the latter method was to be preferred in routine analysis because of its ease, rapidity and reproducibility.

Related Organizations
Keywords

DNA, Bacterial, Base Composition, Chromatography, Bacteria, Pseudomonas, Research, Escherichia coli, Acetobacter, Agrobacterium, DNA, Acetates, Acetic Acid, Rhizobium

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    54
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
54
Average
Top 1%
Top 10%
bronze