
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>pmid: 14121200
SUMMARY: The base composition of purified DNA from 28 strains of acetic acid bacteria was determined. Most strains of the genus Gluconobacter clustered closely together at 60.6–63.4 % (guanine + cytosine) of total base. All strains of the Acetobacter aceti biotype lay within the range 55.4–64.0 % (guanine + cytosine). The close relationship and possible common phylo-genetic origin of the genera Gluconobacter and Acetobacter is again stressed by these results. The base composition of DNA from acetic acid bacteria and from species of Pseudomonas was very similar, confirming the suspected close relationship between these groups. There is a noticeable agreement between the sequences of Acetobacter strains, arranged according to increasing % (guanine + cytosine) and arranged according to increasing enzymic equipment: strains with greater biochemical activity have on the whole also a higher % (guanine + cytosine) in DNA. The range of the compositional distribution of DNA molecules is on the whole broader in Acetobacter than in Gluconobacter. The results corroborate previous conclusions that both biotypes contain clusters of strains without species differentiation. A comparison of the paper chromatographic analysis with the method of thermal denaturation (‘melting point’) for estimating base composition of DNA showed that the latter method was to be preferred in routine analysis because of its ease, rapidity and reproducibility.
DNA, Bacterial, Base Composition, Chromatography, Bacteria, Pseudomonas, Research, Escherichia coli, Acetobacter, Agrobacterium, DNA, Acetates, Acetic Acid, Rhizobium
DNA, Bacterial, Base Composition, Chromatography, Bacteria, Pseudomonas, Research, Escherichia coli, Acetobacter, Agrobacterium, DNA, Acetates, Acetic Acid, Rhizobium
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 54 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
