
The proofs first generated by automated theorem provers are far from optimal by any measure of simplicity. In this paper, I describe a technique for simplifying automated proofs. Hopefully, this discussion will stimulate interest in the larger, still open, question of what reasonable measures of proof simplicity might be. This article is part of the theme issue ‘The notion of ‘simple proof’ - Hilbert's 24th problem’.
Complexity of proofs, FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Logic in Computer Science, Theorem proving (automated and interactive theorem provers, deduction, resolution, etc.), automated theorem proving, Mathematics - Logic, proof simplification, Logic in Computer Science (cs.LO), Mechanization of proofs and logical operations, FOS: Mathematics, Logic (math.LO)
Complexity of proofs, FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Logic in Computer Science, Theorem proving (automated and interactive theorem provers, deduction, resolution, etc.), automated theorem proving, Mathematics - Logic, proof simplification, Logic in Computer Science (cs.LO), Mechanization of proofs and logical operations, FOS: Mathematics, Logic (math.LO)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 12 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
