
Abstract In the early 1850s, the pioneering stage of the decipherment of Mesopotamian cuneiform writing, the hallmark of the urban culture of ancient Iraq, was completed. Since then, several hundreds of thousands of clay tablets with this writing have been excavated and are now deposited in various museums of Europe, North America, and the Near East; of these, some tens of thousands have been published. In a sense, we suffer from having too much evidence, textual and archaeological, and, as we shall see, a major problem concerning the chronology of the early second millennium b. c. is the assignment of priorities among the various arguments that have been advanced. I thought that I might best serve the purposes of this meeting if I attempt to give a sketchy outline of the types of evidence, the nature of the results, and some of the complex problems in the field of the chronology of ancient Mesopotamia.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
