
Despite more than a century of biological research on the evolution and maintenance of mimetic signals, the relative frequencies of models and mimics necessary to establish and maintain Batesian mimicry in natural populations remain understudied. Here we investigate the frequency-dependent dynamics of imperfect Batesian mimicry, using predation experiments involving artificial butterfly models. We use two geographically distinct populations ofAdelphabutterflies that vary in their relative frequencies of a putatively defended model (Adelpha iphiclus) and Batesian mimic (Adelpha serpa). We found that in Costa Rica, where both species share similar abundances, Batesian mimicry breaks down, and predators more readily attack artificial butterfly models of the presumed mimic,A. serpa. By contrast, in Ecuador, whereA. iphiclus(model) is significantly more abundant thanA. serpa(mimic), both species are equally protected from predation. Our results provide compelling experimental evidence that imperfect Batesian mimicry is frequency-dependent on the relative abundance of models and mimics in natural populations, and contribute to the growing body of evidence that complex dynamics, such as seasonality or the availability of alternative prey, influence the evolution of mimetic traits.
Costa Rica, abundance, Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, Animal, seasonality, Biological Mimicry, Batesian mimicry, Biological Sciences, Biological, Medical and Health Sciences, Models, Biological, Birds, Models, frequency dependence, Predatory Behavior, Wings, Animals, Wings, Animal, predation, Ecuador, Butterflies, Biotechnology
Costa Rica, abundance, Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, Animal, seasonality, Biological Mimicry, Batesian mimicry, Biological Sciences, Biological, Medical and Health Sciences, Models, Biological, Birds, Models, frequency dependence, Predatory Behavior, Wings, Animals, Wings, Animal, predation, Ecuador, Butterflies, Biotechnology
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 36 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
