
Within species, larger offspring typically outperform smaller offspring. While the relationship between offspring size and performance is ubiquitous, the cause of this relationship remains elusive. By linking metabolic and life-history theory, we provide a general explanation for why larger offspring perform better than smaller offspring. Using high-throughput respirometry arrays, we link metabolic rate to offspring size in two species of marine bryozoan. We found that metabolism scales allometrically with offspring size in both species: while larger offspring use absolutely more energy than smaller offspring, larger offspring use proportionally less of their maternally derived energy throughout the dependent, non-feeding phase. The increased metabolic efficiency of larger offspring while dependent on maternal investment may explain offspring size effects—larger offspring reach nutritional independence (feed for themselves) with a higher proportion of energy relative to structure than smaller offspring. These findings offer a potentially universal explanation for why larger offspring tend to perform better than smaller offspring but studies on other taxa are needed.
2300 Environmental Science, Allometry, 1300 Biochemistry, Egg size, 2400 Immunology and Microbiology, Genetics and Molecular Biology, 338, Biological Evolution, Bryozoa, 1100 Agricultural and Biological Sciences, 2700 Medicine, Maternal effect, Species Specificity, 1300 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, Larva, Animals, Body Size, Energy Metabolism
2300 Environmental Science, Allometry, 1300 Biochemistry, Egg size, 2400 Immunology and Microbiology, Genetics and Molecular Biology, 338, Biological Evolution, Bryozoa, 1100 Agricultural and Biological Sciences, 2700 Medicine, Maternal effect, Species Specificity, 1300 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, Larva, Animals, Body Size, Energy Metabolism
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 49 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
