Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Recolector de Cienci...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Soil Science
Article . 2009 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Evaluation of Portable X-ray Fluorescence for Gypsum Quantification in Soils

Authors: Weindorf, David C.; Zhu, Yuanda; Ferrell, Ray; Rolong, Nelson A.; Barnet, Tom; Allen, Brett L.; Herrero Isern, Juan; +1 Authors

Evaluation of Portable X-ray Fluorescence for Gypsum Quantification in Soils

Abstract

The use of field portable X-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectrometry as a quantification tool for gypsum content in soils of West Texas and southern New Mexico, USA, was evaluated. Six sites were evaluated with gypsum contents ranging from less than 10% to greater than 90%. Samples collected from each site were scanned in the field using XRF and then transported to the laboratory for additional XRF scanning. Variables that might affect XRF scanning results, such as scanning time, particle size, moisture content, and so on, were evaluated. Both gypsum (CaSO4 • 2H2O) and calcite (CaCO 3) were quantified using standard laboratory techniques. Three data sets were compared: (1) soil characterization data, obtained from the National Soil Survey Laboratory Research Database in Lincoln, NE; (2) quantitative X-ray diffraction; and (3) portable XRF (PXRF). The best correlation of gypsum XRF data (via Ca quantification minus calcite content) and laboratory data was between PXRF and quantitative X-ray diffraction (R = 0.96). On average, PXRF provided results within 6% of soil characterization data, the current laboratory standard for gypsum quantification. Field PXRF shows considerable promise as a rapid, quantifiable measure of gypsum in soils. © 2009 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

Peer Reviewed

Keywords

XRF, Gypsum, Aridisols

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    29
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 29
    download downloads 26
  • 29
    views
    26
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
29
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
29
26
Green