
Several attempts have been made to combine drugs for treating visceral leishmaniasis, but only recently have effective drugs become available and combinations been tested systematically.Sequential treatments with liposomal amphotericin B followed by miltefosine or paromomycin (as short as 7 days), as well as the concomitant administration of miltefosine and paromomycin (for 10 days) are very effective in India (>95%). Sodium stibogluconate plus paromomycin for 17 days is more than 90% effective in East Africa. The shortened combination regimens are cost-effective in India. No combination has been tested so far in Brazil, Nepal and Bangladesh, although studies may be expected in the near future. No cost-effectiveness analysis has been done as yet outside India.There is evidence of high efficacy and benefits with sequential and co-administration treatments in India. More studies are needed in other endemic areas. Introducing combinations and scaling up their use will be challenging. Experience acquired with malaria may be useful. Proper monitoring of use and effects (efficacy and safety) will be required. Currently there are no options for fixed-dose combination treatments for leishmaniasis.
Visceral Leishmaniasis, Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions, Paromomycin, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Phosphorylcholine, Antiprotozoal Agents, Drug Resistance, 610, 613, Drug Toxicity, Antimony Sodium Gluconate, Amphotericin B, Combination Drug Therapy, Leishmaniasis, Visceral, Drug Therapy, Combination, use
Visceral Leishmaniasis, Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions, Paromomycin, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Phosphorylcholine, Antiprotozoal Agents, Drug Resistance, 610, 613, Drug Toxicity, Antimony Sodium Gluconate, Amphotericin B, Combination Drug Therapy, Leishmaniasis, Visceral, Drug Therapy, Combination, use
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 50 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
