
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>pmid: 39090781
Summary: Manipulation of the superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) has become a mainstay of face-lifting procedures. The various surgical approaches to the SMAS traditionally have been classified as either “low” or “high” SMAS techniques, the former of which, although expeditious, have been criticized for suboptimal upper midface rejuvenation. High SMAS techniques, by contrast, are lauded for their ability to improve upper midface contours, but they may carry increased surgical risk, particularly in the hands of less experienced aesthetic surgeons. The authors present the U-SMAS lift: an imbricating approach to the SMAS that builds upon well-described low SMAS techniques with the addition of a malar flap of mobile-only SMAS for orbitomalar rejuvenation. This novel, hybrid technique harnesses the advantages of traditional low and high SMAS techniques while mitigating surgical risk. Of 61 U-SMAS lifts performed, a minor complication rate of 16.4% was observed. No major complications were observed. The mean follow-up period was 371 days. The U-SMAS lift is a safe and powerful facial rejuvenation technique for both beginning surgeons with advanced aesthetic training and well-versed aesthetic surgeons.
Male, Adult, Rhytidoplasty, Humans, Rejuvenation, Female, Middle Aged, Surgical Flaps, Superficial Musculoaponeurotic System, Aged
Male, Adult, Rhytidoplasty, Humans, Rejuvenation, Female, Middle Aged, Surgical Flaps, Superficial Musculoaponeurotic System, Aged
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
