
pmid: 19826354
A main criterion to identify activity in phase II studies is the response rates achieved in a well-defined subset of patients. The response could be defined as a measure of tumor shrinkage. For 30 years, metric methods have been used to assess this response. The World Health Organization was the first organization to propose a unified definition for response status. Over time, the latter evolved and 10 years ago an international consensus panel proposed the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria. Although these guidelines for response assessment have limitations and biases, they have nevertheless been proven useful and advantageous. This article reviews those criteria and describes their use.
MESH: Forecasting, MESH: Remission Induction, [SDV.IMM] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Immunology, Antineoplastic Agents, World Health Organization, MESH: World Health Organization, Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic, MESH: Practice Guidelines as Topic, Neoplasms, 616, 617, Humans, MESH: Neoplasms, MESH: Treatment Outcome, MESH: Humans, MESH: Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic, Remission Induction, Treatment Outcome, Practice Guidelines as Topic, MESH: Antineoplastic Agents, [SDV.IMM]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Immunology, Forecasting
MESH: Forecasting, MESH: Remission Induction, [SDV.IMM] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Immunology, Antineoplastic Agents, World Health Organization, MESH: World Health Organization, Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic, MESH: Practice Guidelines as Topic, Neoplasms, 616, 617, Humans, MESH: Neoplasms, MESH: Treatment Outcome, MESH: Humans, MESH: Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic, Remission Induction, Treatment Outcome, Practice Guidelines as Topic, MESH: Antineoplastic Agents, [SDV.IMM]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Immunology, Forecasting
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 9 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
