Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Pediatric Ingestions of Hand Sanitizers

Debunking the Myth
Authors: Rita, Mrvos; Edward P, Krenzelok;

Pediatric Ingestions of Hand Sanitizers

Abstract

Poison centers frequently receive calls concerning children who are exposed to hand sanitizers. These exposures can occur while the product is being used correctly or when a child has unsupervised access to the container. In 2007, the use of ethanol-containing hand sanitizers in the pediatric population came under media scrutiny owing to an Internet urban legend that resulted in a greater awareness of the potential toxicity of these sanitizers based on their high ethanol content.A retrospective review of all exposures to hand sanitizers in children younger than 6 years reported to a regional poison information center from January 1, 2000 to March 30, 2007 was performed. Data reviewed included substance, age, sex, and outcome. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.Six hundred forty-seven cases were identified including 324 females and 323 males. Ages ranged from 1 month to 5 years with a mean of 1.89 years and a median of 2 years. Outcome data included 31 patients (4.8%) with no effect, 26 (4%) with a minor effect, 372 cases (57.5%) coded as nontoxic Y expect no effect, 208 cases (32.1%) with minimal clinical effects possible, and 10 cases (1.6%) where the symptoms were judged to be unrelated to the exposure. There were no moderate or major outcomes and no fatalities.Children in this age group have frequent hand-to-mouth activity and environmental curiosity making the application or availability of a hand sanitizer the perfect situation for an exposure to occur. Although ethanol-based hand sanitizers have the potential to cause toxicity, the benefits of prevention of illness outweigh the hazards when used in a supervised situation.

Keywords

Male, Poison Control Centers, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Pennsylvania, Eating, Child, Preschool, Anti-Infective Agents, Local, Humans, Female, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    9
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
9
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!