Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Thyroid Frozen Section

Supplementary or Unnecessary?
Authors: Tatjana, Antic; Jerome B, Taxy;

Thyroid Frozen Section

Abstract

A total of 704 cases of thyroid cancer were retrospectively reviewed (2005 to 2011) to assess the contribution of frozen section (FS) to preoperative fine-needle aspiration (FNA). There were 613 papillary carcinomas (87.1%), of which 237 were <1.0 cm. FNA was diagnostic or suspicious in 39.9% of micropapillary thyroid carcinomas and 75.8% of papillary carcinomas. FS was diagnostic in 52.3% and 76.6%, respectively. In no instance did the FS diagnosis change the procedure (total or near-total thyroidectomy). Neither FNA nor FS was diagnostically definitive in follicular neoplasms. A diagnosis of follicular carcinoma was made only after thorough histologic analysis. FS should have a less prominent role in the management of thyroid masses, especially in the context of total thyroidectomy for benign disease. FS may be more productively applied to the identification of metastatic lymph nodes or parathyroids in the surgical field.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Adolescent, Biopsy, Fine-Needle, Carcinoma, Middle Aged, Carcinoma, Papillary, Diagnosis, Differential, Parathyroid Glands, Thyroid Cancer, Papillary, Adenocarcinoma, Follicular, Preoperative Period, Frozen Sections, Humans, Female, Lymph Nodes, Child, Aged, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    34
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
34
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!