Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Other Primary Epithelial Neoplasms of the Liver

Authors: Wai Szeto; Rifat Mannan;

Other Primary Epithelial Neoplasms of the Liver

Abstract

Primary liver carcinoma (PLC) is the sixth most common malignancy worldwide and the third leading cause of cancer-related mortalities. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most prevalent form of PLC, followed by intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA). In addition, there is a group of rarer PLCs that do not fit neatly into the HCC or iCCA categories. This review explores this heterogeneous group, including combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA), intermediate cell carcinoma (ICC), mixed hepatocellular-neuroendocrine carcinoma, and undifferentiated primary liver carcinoma. cHCC-CCA is a rare subtype of PLC, characterized by both hepatocytic and cholangiocytic differentiation within the same tumor. The latest WHO classification (2019, fifth edition) redefined cHCC-CCA by eliminating the “stem cell subtypes” and emphasized that diagnosis should primarily rely on morphologic features, supported by immunohistochemical staining to better define subtypes. Intermediate cell carcinoma is a subtype of cHCC-CCA and is comprised of monomorphic tumor cells that exhibit characteristics intermediate between hepatocytes and cholangiocytes, with immunohistochemical expression of hepatocytic and cholangiocytic markers within the same cell. Another rare entity, combined HCC and neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC), contains an admixture of HCC and NEC components within the same tumor. Undifferentiated primary liver carcinoma, on the other hand, lacks definitive lineage differentiation beyond an epithelial phenotype. These heterogeneous PLCs pose diagnostic challenges owing to their mixed/unusual histologic features and overlapping immunohistochemical markers. They tend to have poor prognoses, highlighting the critical importance of accurate and timely diagnosis.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?