Found an issue? Give us feedback

JONA The Journal of ...arrow_drop_down

JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration

Article . 2024 . Peer-reviewed

Data sources: Crossref

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.go...

Article . 2024

Data sources: Europe PubMed Central

Select content type to embed

All Research products

arrow_drop_down

<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>

COPY SCRIPT

For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu

Building an Evidence-Based Foundation for Virtual Nursing

Name: Building an Evidence-Based Foundation for Virtual Nursing
Creator: Carol, Boston-Fleischhauer
Keywords: 03 medical and health sciences, Consensus, 0302 clinical medicine, Critical Care, Patient Satisfaction, Workforce, Humans, 0305 other medical science, 3. Good health

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 01 Feb 2024Publisher:Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)Journal:JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration, volume 54, pages 77-78 (issn: 0002-0443, eissn: 1539-0721,

Authors: Carol, Boston-Fleischhauer;

doi: 10.1097/nna.0000000000001385

pmid: 38261640

Building an Evidence-Based Foundation for Virtual Nursing

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

Virtual nursing is viewed as a key strategy to support safe, effective staffing in acute care amid continued RN workforce challenges. Consensus has not been reached on the optimal model that can drive highly impactful results for virtual nursing. Research is needed on the most effective strategies to optimize the role of the virtual nurse. In addition, nurse leaders need evidence to confirm which virtual models are the most strongly positioned to impact staff and patient satisfaction, quality, labor costs, and length of stay.

Keywords

Consensus, Critical Care, Patient Satisfaction, Workforce, Humans

Impact byBIP!

	citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	0
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average