Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Radboud Repositoryarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Radboud Repository
Article . 2011
Data sources: Radboud Repository
Cancer Nursing
Article . 2011 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 4 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Discharge Advice in Cancer Patients

Posttreatment Patients' Report
Authors: De Leeuw, J.; Prins, J.B.; Prins, J.B.; Merkx, M.A.W.; Marres, H.A.M.; van Achterberg, T.;

Discharge Advice in Cancer Patients

Abstract

Cancer patients are presented with advice and instructions during treatment and at discharge. Most recommendations aim at relief of physical problems, psychosocial well-being, and patients' health care behaviors. Patients often struggle to incorporate advice into daily life, and this influences symptom relief, quality of life, and even longevity.The aim of this study was to gain insight into the content and form of discharge advice to cancer patients and to determine the factors that hinder or promote the actual adoption of advice by patients.Using a descriptive, exploratory research design, data were collected using structured interviews in a convenience sample of 21 head and neck cancer patients who had completed treatment with curative intent 2 to 6 months earlier. Descriptive statistics and a thematic content analysis procedure were used to analyze the data.Findings showed that advice or instructions received by individual patients had a range from 1 to 13, and that 17 out of 21 patients received 4 advices or more. Relevant influencing factors included patient characteristics (cognition, emotion, behavior, and social aspects) and characteristics of health professionals (content and efficacy of advice, professional attitude, behavior, and communication).Cancer patients try but often struggle to fit the multitude and complexity of advice from health professionals into everyday life.There seems to be an excellent opportunity for health professionals to support cancer patients by further tailoring of follow-up care. Knowledge and insight into the challenges patients face posttreatment will benefit both professionals and patients.

Country
Netherlands
Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, NCEBP 8: Psychological determinants of chronic illness ONCOL 4: Quality of Care, Professional-Patient Relations, Continuity of Patient Care, Middle Aged, Patient Discharge, NCEBP 6: Quality of nursing and allied health care ONCOL 4: Quality of Care, ONCOL 3: Translational research, Patient Education as Topic, Head and Neck Neoplasms, Patient Satisfaction, NCEBP 2: Evaluation of complex medical interventions ONCOL 3: Translational research, Quality of Life, Humans, Female, Aged, Follow-Up Studies, Netherlands

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    7
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
7
Average
Average
Average
Green